Organizations are shifting from abstract frameworks to more grounded, practical decision-making in cybersecurity as they look to 2026. April Lenhard, Principal Product Manager at Qualys, believes that the upcoming year will be a significant turning point in both the national development of cybersecurity policy and the understanding of technical risk within businesses.

Resilience is a common element in both technology and policy. Resilience is not just a buzzword; rather, it is a useful result of improved prioritizing, realistic simulations and increased cooperation between the public and commercial sectors.

Attack-Path Modeling Comes of Age

The development of attack-path modeling is one of the biggest changes anticipated in 2026. What was previously restricted to theoretical mappings and static graphs is now developing into something much more useful and dynamic.

Attack routes are starting to resemble digital cyber ranges, which are interactive settings that let security teams simulate actual attacks. These models allow teams to run “what-if” or “now-what” scenarios in real time and facilitate red-teaming practices. Organizations may test, observe and react appropriately to an environment rather than speculating about how an attacker would move through it.

Additionally, the change puts cybersecurity closer to conventional wargaming concepts. For many years, the cyber aspect was generally neglected in extensive strategic planning exercises. That is now shifting. Wargame-style thinking is anticipated to be used to cybersecurity on a much larger scale in 2026, assisting corporations in better understanding how threats change over time and across systems.

Simultaneously, there is a noticeable shift in the sector away from only counting assets. Organizations are moving toward risk-prioritized operations instead of concentrating on the number of systems or vulnerabilities. According to this model, well-informed prioritization reduces disruption, conserves scarce resources and focuses attention on what really matters – when it matters most. Better decisions, not more data, are the goal.

A New Shape for Federal Cyber Policy

In 2026, the political environment is anticipated to have a significant impact on cybersecurity. Cybersecurity is still one of the few sectors with substantial bipartisan agreement, despite wide disparities in many other policy areas. The desire for greater national resilience and common worries about nation-state dangers are the main causes of this.

Federal cyber policy will probably continue to be anchored by that consensus. But at the same time, another change is taking place. Academic institutions and leaders in the business sector are increasingly filling the gap left by the government’s withdrawal from ongoing, open communication. In the upcoming year, it is anticipated that their impact over standards, priorities and best practices will increase.

Certain fundamental requirements won’t change. System upgrading, information exchange and rapid incident reporting will remain essential. The increasing connection of cybersecurity policy, quantum computing and artificial intelligence is unique. Separate treatment is no longer given to these points of interest. Rather, they are becoming deeply interconnected with national security planning, legislation and more broad commercial competition.

To put it simply, it is anticipated that government cyber strategy in 2026 will combine a geopolitically motivated push for resilience with a common understanding of dangers. It will, however, depend more on industry and academic leadership, especially when new technologies change the risk environment.

Looking Ahead

When considered collectively, these changes indicate a more advanced stage of cybersecurity. By 2026, an organization’s ability to reproduce real threats, prioritize real risks and respond clearly will determine progress rather than the number of measures in place.

The goal is to shift from static defence to actual resilience, whether through more realistic attack-path simulations or a more coordinated approach to national cyber policy.

The author is April Lenhard, Principal Product Manager at Qualys.

Disclaimer: The views expressed are solely of the author and ETCISO does not necessarily subscribe to it. ETCISO shall not be responsible for any damage caused to any person/organization directly or indirectly.

Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals.

Subscribe to Newsletter to get latest insights & analysis in your inbox.

All about ETCISO industry right on your smartphone!